![epson stylus photo r3000 vs canon pro 1 epson stylus photo r3000 vs canon pro 1](https://i.pinimg.com/474x/2d/40/0c/2d400c6610f6c212a3c1aabce86d6aad.jpg)
![epson stylus photo r3000 vs canon pro 1 epson stylus photo r3000 vs canon pro 1](http://safaslightning.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/7/2/127233485/624558971_orig.jpg)
I hardly print anything anymore, mainly due to frustration. I've had Canon and Epson printers and I prefer Epson.ĭye sub printers are great if you want speed so used by event photographers to sell on the spot but not the thing to buy for "fine art" printing - sacrifice quality and print lifetime. I've had mine for 3 years and I would replace it with the same unless Epson brought out something even better. Better than pro-lab prints on real photographic paper (i.e.
EPSON STYLUS PHOTO R3000 VS CANON PRO 1 PROFESSIONAL
Superb quality prints suitable for professional purposes if used in a proper colour-managed workflow. Would you recommend your printer to a good friend for their own use, and if not why not.Īre you wanting to replace it with another model or would you replace it with the same model again if you had to.įor really top quality inkjet printing, the Epson SC-P600 (around £500) and related printers (ultrachrome inks) are in a class of their own. If you would like to advise on the make and model of printer.Īlso the size you would normally print and what size the machine will go up to. I am wondering how many contributors to Alamy have a printer at home or in their office and actually print off photos themselves for whatever use, the reasons are not important.